What we do

On this page

Our aims

We aim to improve life chances of disadvantaged and often marginalised groups. We do this by supporting UK registered charities that work to tackle disadvantage, mainly in the fields of housing, education, welfare and social mobility. We make grants to a range of projects in support of young people, people with mental health problems, homeless people and others suffering disadvantage.

Understanding the charities we support

We actively engage and understand the organisations we support and our trustees always visit the programmes supported by our Strategic grants.

We assess the impact of our support for charities by agreeing the anticipated outcomes with the organisations while receiving regular reports from them on their work and evaluating the impact of the programme at its conclusion.

Our priorities

Children and young people

Our priority for funding charities that work with children and young people is to increase life chances by developing life skills, emotional resilience and mental well-being and by promoting social mobility.

View grant recipients
Homelessness

Our priority for funding charities that work with homeless people is to support services that help people out of homelessness, by providing for immediate needs and long term accommodation and rehabilitation.

View grant recipients
Social mobility

Our priority for funding charities that work to improve social mobility is to support those making practical improvements, primarily in the motivation, education, skills and training of disadvantaged people of all ages and backgrounds.

View grant recipients
Hospices, Armed services personnel and other welfare

Our priority for funding charities that work for hospices, Armed services personnel and other welfare is to support excellent care and good quality accommodation and to provide information so that people know what benefits they are entitled to receive.

View grant recipients

Social investment

We aim to hold 5% of our overall asset allocation in social investments. We intend to do this by way of Programme Related Investments (PRIs) in charitable organisations for specific (often property related) projects. PRIs are made exclusively to further our charitable objects by funding specific activities of a third party which, in turn, contribute to our own charitable purposes. These investments aim to achieve a social impact while intended to be repayable with interest and/or a return of capital to the Charity at the end of the term.

What form can PRI take?

Provided we have satisfied ourselves that the proposed arrangement may be treated as a PRI and falls within the social sectors supported by the Charity, we will have broad discretion regarding the nature of investment.

We may invest in any form of legal entity (e.g. a housing association, a charity, a community interest company, a private company, an investment fund etc) and the investment may take the form of:

  • Secured loans
  • Unsecured loans
  • Equity
  • Social impact bonds
  • Quasi-equity

Social investments we have made
so far

  • Thera Trust: investment in a bond for the provision of homes for people with learning difficulties and complex needs
  • Bobath Centre: provision of a bridging loan to enable this charity to move premises
  • Commonweal: provision of secured finance for properties used by it in its ‘Peer Landlord’ scheme
  • Thames Reach: provision of secured finance for properties used by it in its ‘Peer Landlord’ scheme.
  • Resonance funds: investing in two funds managed by this social impact investment company - the Women in Safe Homes Fund (WISH) and the Resonance Everyone in Fund (REIF).

Geographic areas

Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Risk

In procedural terms, when deciding to make a PRI we would satisfy ourselves in each case that:

  • the PRI falls within the social sectors supported by the Charity
  • the PRI is an appropriate and effective way of utilising the Charity’s assets to advance our charitable aims in terms of expediency and risk
  • appropriate legal documentation is in place to safeguard the PRI to ensure the PRI is not used for a purpose which does not advance our charitable aims
  • the PRI does not confer an unacceptable private benefit
  • the PRI will not give rise to adverse reputational issues for the Charity (e.g. which may arise by virtue of any ancillary private benefit centred on a non-charitable co-investor)

Conclusions

In procedural terms, when deciding to make a PRI we would satisfy ourselves in each case that:

  • Impact and effectiveness: we are developing an impact and effectiveness framework. This will be proportional and light touch so that it recognises some of the complexities and ambiguities of the work we fund
  • Grantee outcomes: we ask grantees to identify three outcomes associated with the funding they receive and agree indicators associated with progress against each grantee outcome
  • What form can PRI take?

    Provided we have satisfied ourselves that the proposed arrangement may be treated as a PRI and falls within the social sectors supported by the Charity we will have broad discretion regarding the nature of investment.

    We may invest in any form of legal entity (e.g. a housing association, a charity, a community interest company, a private company, an investment fund etc) and the investment may take the form of:

    • Secured loans
    • Unsecured loans
    • Equity
    • Social impact bonds
    • Quasi-equity
  • Social investments we have made
    • Thera Trust: investment in a bond for the provision of homes for people with learning difficulties and complex needs
    • Bobath Centre: provision of a bridging loan to enable this charity to move premises
    • Commonweal: provision of secured finance for properties used by it in its ‘Peer Landlord’ scheme
    • Thames Reach: provision of secured finance for properties used by it in its ‘Peer Landlord’ scheme.
  • Geographic areas

    Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

  • Risk

    In procedural terms, when deciding to make a PRI we would satisfy ourselves in each case that:

    • the PRI falls within the social sectors supported by the Charity
    • the PRI is an appropriate and effective way of utilising the Charity’s assets to advance our charitable aims in terms of expediency and risk
    • appropriate legal documentation is in place to safeguard the PRI to ensure the PRI is not used for a purpose which does not advance our charitable aims
    • the PRI does not confer an unacceptable private benefit
    • the PRI will not give rise to adverse reputational issues for the Charity (e.g. which may arise by virtue of any ancillary private benefit centred on a non-charitable co-investor)
  • Conclusions

    In procedural terms, when deciding to make a PRI we would satisfy ourselves in each case that:

    • Impact and effectiveness: we are developing an impact and effectiveness framework. This will be proportional and light touch so that it recognises some of the complexities and ambiguities of the work we fund
    • Grantee outcomes: we ask grantees to identify three outcomes associated with the funding they receive and agree indicators associated with progress against each grantee outcome